Manjan Yadav @ Amresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73180 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2022 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== MANJAN YADAV @ AMRESH YADAV Son of Jagat Yadav R/V- Rampur Ward No. 6, P.S- Lokha, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shivnandan Bharti, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect (s) within four weeks.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Allegedly, on search, 135 litres of Nepali liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor or any trade of liquor. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73180 of 2022(2) dt.18-03-2023 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He was not apprehended on the spot. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, as the illicit liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T