Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31001/2017bail granted

Md. Sakib @ Md. Sakib Alam v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31001 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2806 Year- 2014 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Md. Sakib @ Md. Sakib Alam, son of Late Safik, resident of VillageSatvita, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Bibi Rajina Khatoon, wife of Md Sakib Alam, Daughter of Md. Sajjad, resident of Village- Lahtora, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Akbar Ali, APP 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 498A, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 12 of the petition it has been stated that the petitioner is ready for amicable settlement of dispute and restoration of conjugal life.

In the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 2806-C of 2014 to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31001 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and, further, with the condition that the Court below shall notice the parties and take necessary steps for amicable settlement. If the petitioner would be found cooperative in the settlement of dispute and willing for restoration of conjugal life, then, the provisional anticipatory bail shall be confirmed by the Court below, itself, otherwise necessary order would be passed according to law.

(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √