Ranjay Singh @ Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.796 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2021 Thana- PUNPUN District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

RANJAY SINGH @ RANJAN SINGH Son of Chandraket Singh Resident of Village- Pakauli, P.S.- Punpun, District- Patna 2.

Nitish Kumar Son of Chandraket Singh Resident of Village- Pakauli, P.S.- Punpun, District- Patna 3.

Sanjay Singh Son of Chandraket Singh Resident of Village- Pakauli, P.S.- Punpun, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vivekanand Vivek For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 354, 379, 504, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.796 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 that petitioners are quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that both sides are agnates and there is an admitted land dispute between the parties. It is submitted that for the alleged occurrence, there is a case and counter-case between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the State as well as the learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail application and submitted that the injuries are grievous in nature which also transpires from the impugned order.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is rejected. This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shweta/- U T