← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1828/2018disposed

Leelawati Devi @ Leela Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-09Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1828 of 2018 ====================================================== Leelawati Devi @ Leela Devi, W/o Late Bijay Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village- Dhakjari, P.O.- Harauli, P.S.- Sonbarsa Kutchery, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Panchaiti Raj, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Director General, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna.

6. Collector, Saharsa.

7. District Panchayati Raj Officer, Saharsa.

8. Sub Divisional Officer, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa.

9. Block Development Officer, Burma Itarhi, District- Saharsa.

10. Block Development Officer, Mahesi, district Saharsa ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mallika Mazumdar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay Kr. Rastogi- Aag10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 09-01-2019 Petitioner is permitted to implead the Block Development Officer, Mahesi, Saharsa, as respondent no. 10 to this application.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State.

Learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, is also present.

Counter affidavit has been filed by the counsel for the State on behalf of respondent no. 6 stating therein that all retiral benefits has been paid to the petitioner and only family pension

Patna High Court CWJC No.1828 of 2018(4) dt.09-01-2019 2/2 is due to her. It has been stated in paragraph 7 that the Block Development Officer, Mahesi, Saharsa, has sent the letter to the petitioner, the wife of late erstwhile employee, Vijay Kumar Yadav, to submit her pension papers so that her family pension may be processed.

Considering the same and after hearing the parties, this writ application is disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to produce all the relevant papers before the Block Development Officer, Mahesi, Saharsa, respondent no. 10, who would process and send sanction order to the authorities concerned, which will be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months, from the date of filing of such pension papers. (Nilu Agrawal, J) Shamshad/- U