Priti Kumari, v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19556 of 2019 ====================================================== Priti Kumari, D/O Shivo Manjhi, W/O Kaushal Kumar Manjhi, R/o- Vill - Ward no. 11 Gram Manorathpur Tulsi Hawasa, P.s.- A.P.M Distt- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the secretary Human Resource Development Department, New Delhi.
2.
The Director, National Institute of Open Schooling A-24-25, Institutional Area, Sector 62 Noida U.P.
3.
The Director, Department of Student Support Service national Institute of Open Schooling A-24-25, Institutional Area, Sector 62 Noida U.P. 4.
The Regional Director, National Institute of Open Schooling Regional Centre, Lalit Bhawan (Ground Floor), Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Baily Road, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kedar Jha, Adv.
For U.O.I.
Mrs. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC Mr. Vaibhav Kumar Jha, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Union of India.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to make correction in date of birth of petitioner, which was wrongly mentioned in marks statement and other documents relating to Secondary School Examination, 2015 as 04.04.1998 in place of 05.03.1997 since the correct date of birth of petitioner is 05.03.1997.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the date of birth of the petitioner in the marks statement and other documents has been wrongly mentioned as 04.04.1998 in place
Patna High Court CWJC No.19556 of 2019(5) dt.20-08-2024 2/2 of 05.03.1997.
4. Learned counsel for the Union of India submits that the same relief which has been claimed in C.W.J.C. No. 17907 of 2018 which was rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.07.2023 with a liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedy before a competent court, if so advised, for declaration of her date of birth.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials available on record, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedy before a competent court, if so advised, for declaration of her date of birth.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U