Md. Mannan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63626 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- Salmari District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Mannan S/O Late Md. Khalil @ Haji Khalil Resident of Village- Miniya Bari, P.S.- Salmari, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Musowir, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-09-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 324(4) & (5), 308(5), 352, 351(2)(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 11-9-2024, the accused person, namely, Md. Mohsin and petitioner came with deadly weapons and demanded extortion of Rs. 20 lakh from the informant and also stopped the construction work and also threatened to face dire consequences.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63626 of 2025(3) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the informant falsely implicated the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is a purchaser of the disputed land and co-accused Md. Mohsin is grand-son of R.S. Khatiyan holder, namely, Basiruddin and the informant is trying to capture the land by purchasing the land from a person, who does not have title over the land and when the informant was confronted, the instant false case came to be instituted.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Salmari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T