← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9584/2017disposed

Md. Washi Ahmad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-17Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9584 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Md. Washi Ahmad, Son of Late Md. Usman, Resident of Village + P.O.+ P.S.-Gamhariya, District-Madhepura

2. Shanti Kumari, Wife of Umesh Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village+P.O.- Rahta, P.S.-Kumar Khand, Distirict-Madhepura

3. Krishna Kumari, Wife of Sant Kumar, Resident of Village-P.O.+ P.S.- Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

4. Surya Narayan Ram, Son of Late Sukhdeo Ram, Resident of VillageJaypura, P.O.-Moura Ramnagar, P.S.-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura

5. Chandrika Kumari, Wife of Arvind Kumar, Resident of Village-Jaypura, P.O.-Moura Ramnagar, P.S.-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura

6. Shankar Das, Son of Phuleswar Das, Resident of Village-P.O.-Rajni (Milik), P.S.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura.

7. Md. Shahbad, Son of Md. Ibrar, Resident of Village-P.O.-Rajni (Milik), P.s.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura

8. Ravindra Kumar, Son of Kamleshwari Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village+ P.O.-Kolhay Patti, P.S.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura

9. Ashok Kumar, Son of Samat Lal Yadav, Resident of Village+ P.O.- Kolhay Patti, P.S.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura

10. Ramdeo Yadav, Son of Shital Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village +P.O.- Raghunathpur, P.s.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura

11. Mina Kumari, Wife of Raghunath Kumar, Resident of Village+ P.O.- Kolhay Patti, P.S.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura

12. Hansa Kumari, Wife of Rameshwar Yadav, Resident of VillageTikuliya, P.O.-Bishanpur, P.S.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura

13. Prabha Kumari, Wife of Kishor Kumar Singh, Resident of Village+P.S.-Puraini, P.S.-Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

14. Kumari Nilam, Wife of Sharda Nand Saksena, Resident of Village+P.O.-Rani Patti, P.S.-Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

15. Kavita Kumari, Daughter of Rajendra Prasad Yadav, Both Resident of Village-Parariya, P.O.-Godhela, District-Madhepura

16. Babita Kumari, Daughter of Rajendra Prasad Yadav, Both Resident of Village-Parariya, P.O.-Godhela, District-Madhepura

17. Anita Kumari, Wife of Mahendra Yadav, Resident of Garib Tola, P.O.- Bharrahi, District-Madhepura

18. Ajit Kumar Risideo, Son of Bharat Risideo, Resident of Village-Sagha, P.O.-Babhani, P.S.-Gamhariya, District-Madhepura

19. Swati Kumari, Wife of Mohan Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageSagha, P.O.-Babhani, P.S.-Gamhariya, District-Madhepura

20. Lalan Kumar, Son of Bhuneshwari Yadav, Resident of Village+P.O.- Sihpur, P.S.-Singheswar, District-Madhepura

21. Dinesh Prasad Vidyaker, Son of Laxmi Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village + P.O.-Jharkaha,P.s.-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura

22. Kumari Manju Bharti, Daughter of Basudeo Praasd Yadav, Resident of Village + P.O.-Jharkaha,P.s.-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura

23. Sanjukta Bharti, Wife of Rijendra Yadav, Resident of Village-Guriya, P.O.-Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

24. Nageshwar sardar, Son of Fuleswar Sardar, Resident of VillageGadhiya, P.S.-Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

Patna High Court CWJC No.9584 of 2017 (3) dt.17-01-2018 2/3

25. Upendra Sah, Son of Rameshwar Prasad sah, Resident of VillageKaruwaili, P.O.-Ydua Patti, P.S.-Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

26. Narayan Rajak Son of Yugal Rajak, Resident of Village+P.O.-Baisadh, P.S.-Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

27. Jay Prakash Thakur, Son of Satyadeo Thakur, Resident of VillageBhawanipur, P.O.-Rahata, P.s.-Murliganj, District-Madhepura.

28. Sanju Kumari, Wife of Shambhu Kumar Yadav, Resident of VillageKewatgama, P.O.-Laxmipur (Chandiasthan), P.s.-Kumarkhand, DistrictMadhepura

29. Anil Kumar, Son of Dukha Prasad Yadav, Resident of VillageSakarpura, P.s. + District-Madhepura

30. Rama Kumari, Wife of Raj Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageSakarpura, P.s. + District-Madhepura

31. Mamta Kumari, Daughter of Shyam Sunder Yadav, Resident of Village +P.O.-Sukhasan, P.s.-Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura

32. Ruby Kumari, Wife of Sajjan Kumar Ranjan, Resident of Village + P.O.-Jalsima Via Mangwar, P.S.-Sonwarsa Via Mangwar, District-Saharsa

33. Bijendra Kumar, Son of Basudeo Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village+P.O.-Khadipur, P.s.-Bihra, District-Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department, of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The District Education Officer, Madhepura

6. The District Education Officer, Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, AC to G.A.-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners placed reliance on the decision of this court contained in Annexure-2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State

Patna High Court CWJC No.9584 of 2017 (3) dt.17-01-2018 3/3 submits that the matter was taken to the Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has already decided the case in SLP © No. 32079 of 2015. The learned counsel for the State further submits that in view of the decision of the Apex Court in SLP © No. 32079 of 2015 the case of the petitioners does not merit consideration.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order passed in SLP © No. 32079 of 2015 was subsequently reviewed.

Without going into the aforesaid controversy, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioners in the light of the decision of the Apex Court within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the claim of the petitioners. It is up to the department to examine the claim of the petitioners in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U