Manindra Kumar Singh @ Manindra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.365 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2019 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== MANINDRA KUMAR SINGH @ MANINDRA SINGH, Son of Yamuna Singh, Resident of Village-Madhopur, Police Station-Dhina, DistrictChandauli (Uttar Pradesh). ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Kudra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.365 of 2022(2) dt.14-02-2022 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T