Akash Kumar Pandey @ Bunty @ Baba v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33715 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2016 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ====================================================== Akash Kumar Pandey @ Bunty @ Baba, Son of Bibhuti Bhushan Pandey, Resident of Village- Helajot, P.S.- Jhajha, District Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 122 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the I.P.C. and 25 (1-b) a/26/35 of the Arms Act.
According to the informant, he got information that some people had assembled for the purpose of committing crime. The informant along with police force reached at the place of occurrence and apprehended seven accused persons, who had disclosed the name of the petitioner, as the accused who had fled away from the place of occurrence. The petitioner is said to have been arrested subsequently on 24.03.2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33715 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. It has been further submitted that the provisions of Arms Act are not attracted against the petitioner and further the cases in which he has been implicated are those cases in which the FIR has been registered against unknown persons and the petitioner has been subsequently implicated in the said case, after being arrested in the present case. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2017.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.
Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamui, in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 122 of 2016.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) khushbu/- U T