Sweta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1084 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17137 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Sweta Kumari, W/o Pankaj Kumar, R/o Village-Maraidih, P.S.- Patepur, District-Vaishali.

2.

Niraj Kumar, S/o Harendra Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Maraidih, P.S.- Patepur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

The District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.

The District Program Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 7.

The Program Officer (Establishment), Vaishali at Hajipur. 8.

The Block Pramukh, Jandaha cum-Chairman Block Teacher Employment Unit, Jandaha.

9.

The Block Development Officer, Jandaha.

10.

The Block Education Officer, Jandaha, Cum-Secretary Block Employment Unit, Jandaha, District- Vaishali.

11.

Employment Unit, Block Teachers Employment Unit, Jandaha, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (AAG-15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 14-11-2019 Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1084 of 2019(2) dt.14-11-2019 2/2 a liberty to seek appropriate remedy including filing of an application seeking review of the impugned order in accordance with law.

Permission granted.

As prayed for, the appeal stands disposed as having been withdrawn reserving liberty to seek appropriate remedy including filing of an application seeking review of the impugned order in accordance with law.

It stands clarified that the period for which the appellant has been pursuing the present appeal shall not be counted for the purpose of limitation.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/Amrendra U