← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64046/2019bail granted

Ramesh Mahto @ Ramesh Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-17Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64046 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Ramesh Mahto @ Ramesh Kumar Mahto Son Of Vidha Mahto @ Vidya Mahto Resident of Brahmpur, Police Station-Bhagwan Bazar, District-Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Putul Kumari Wife of Ramesh Mahto, Daughter of Yogendra Mahto Resident of Bhagwan Bazar, At Present Naviganj, Choudhary Tola, P.SBhagwan Bazar, District-Saran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 09-07-2019. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate during trial. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64046 of 2019(2) dt.17-10-2019 2/2 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Saran Mahila. P.S. Case No. 02 of 2018.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T