Sarita @ Sarita Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62219 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-587 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Sarita @ Sarita Devi Son of Vijay Sao @ Surya Narayan R/o Village - Janakpur, Manpur, Police Station - Gaya Muffasil, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Tushar Vaibhav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gaya Muffasil P. S. Case No. 587 of 2025 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that marriage of daughter of the informant was solemnized with co-accused Abhishek Kumar in the year 2015 and thereafter, it is alleged that the F.I.R. named accused persons killed her due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62219 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 is mother-in-law of the deceased and she is simply victim of over implication. Petitioner is separate in mess and property and has got no concern with affairs of the deceased. Thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased who is already in custody since 14.07.2025. Petitioner is lady, claims clean antecedent and is in custody since 17.06.2025. Charge-sheet has already been submitted.
5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that husband of the deceased is already in custody and period of custody, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya Muffasil P. S. Case No. 587 of 2025.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T