← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2365/2021dismissed

Anupam Kumari v. Nishikant Chaudhary

2024-02-09Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2365 of 2021 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1305 of 2018 ====================================================== Anupam Kumari, W/o Nishikant Chaudhary, D/o Anil Kumar Singh, Village and Post - Sihama, P.S.- Sihama, District - Begusarai, Pin- 851129. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

Nishikant Chaudhary, S/o Late Vijaykant Chaudhary, R/o Village - Bijrauhli, P.S.- Tisiauta, District - Vaishali.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sameer Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 09-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. This application has been filed seeking a modification of the order dated 03.10.2018 passed in MJC No. 1305 of 2018 by which while directing transfer of the Matrimonial Case No. 175 of 2017 from the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hajipur at Vaishali to the court of learned Principal/Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Rosera, this Court directed the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.800/- on the date when the petitioner along with her companion or witness shall be required to appear and shall appear in the court.

3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is getting Rs.800/- for the date she appears but with some interval. The submission is that, in fact, there is no court of learned

Patna High Court MJC No.2365 of 2021(3) dt.09-02-2024 2/2 Principal/Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Rosera, therefore, the petitioner is required to appear in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Samastipur which is at a distance of 72 km from Begusarai.

4. It is stated that the court has fixed some maintenance amount but that is not being paid regularly.

5. Be that as it may, this Court is of the considered opinion that the amount of Rs.800/- for the date of appearance is a reasonable amount and it requires no modification.

6. This application has not merit. It is dismissed accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) lekhi/- U