Vivek Sah @ Vivek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65901 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-711 Year-2018 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Vivek Sah @ Vivek Kumar Son of Sri Lalu Sah Resident of Village-Bagraha, Police Station-Ghoghardiha, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Jyoti Kumari @ Jyoti Devi Wife of Vivek Sah @ Vivek Kumar and Daughter of Arun Sah Resident of Village-Bhagwatipur, Police StationPandaul, District-Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with C.R. No.711 of 2018, T.R. No. 682 of 2018 for offences under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute.
Considering the above, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.
Accordingly, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within ten weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65901 of 2019(7) dt.28-01-2022 2/2 ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Madhubani in connection with C.R. No.711 of 2018, T.R. No. 682 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
While accepting the bail bond of the petitioner, the court below shall verify whether there has been any compromise between the parties and pursuant to that compromise, the petitioner has paid the entire amount to the opposite party no.2. In case it is found true, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail and and in case this assertion is found false, the petitioner shall be taken into custody forthwith. (Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U T