Arbind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1370 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2021 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== ARBIND KUMAR Son of Late Harihar Sah Resident of Village- Nauhatta, Ward No.06, Police Station- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The present case has been taken out of turn based on the mentioning made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner, who is in custody, has to appear in an examination of Fireman Constable to be held on 27.03.2022 and in support of the same, the learned counsel has annexed the admit card of the petitioner.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2021, is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and is a young boy of 20 years.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1370 of 2022(2) dt.23-03-2022 2/2 allegation is of looting the informant and his friend of Rs. 2,05,000/- and mobile apart from other articles as detailed in the F.I.R. by four unknown criminals.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Dilkhush Kumar which has no evidentiary value. Learned counsel submits that though the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused but nothing was recovered from his possession.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and is a young boy, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 134 of 2021.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T