Guddu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1486 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2020 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== GUDDU YADAV Son of Punay Yadav Resident of Village- Champapur Pijurpur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kaushal Kishore Jha, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Shankar Kumar Choudhary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-05-2022 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 506, 326, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.06.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and has antecedent of three cases. It is next submitted that all the cases instituted against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1486 of 2022(2) dt.24-05-2022 2/3 petitioner were registered by the side of the informant as the petitioner and the informant are agnates and are having land dispute. The learned counsel further submits that in the FIR it is alleged that the accused persons including the petitioner came to the house of the informant and this petitioner is alleged to have fired causing injury to Shobha Devi on her arm. The learned senior counsel submits that since the informant side and the petitioner side are agnates and are having land dispute as such cases after cases are being instituted against each of the parties, it is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting for the purposes of bail then allegation is of firing causing injury on the non vital part of the body.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 23.06.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and the allegation of firing causing injury is on non vital part of the body, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1486 of 2022(2) dt.24-05-2022 3/3 court in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2020.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) shahzad/- U T