Vinod Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34274 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2017 Thana -DARBHANGA District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Vinod Sah, Son of Late Basudeo Sah.

2. Sanjay Sah, Son of Late Basudeo Sah.

3. Mahesh Sah, Son of Narayan Sah.

All are resident of Village Ratnapatti, Police Station- Town, DistrictDarbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Town P.S. Case No. 60 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 448, 323, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation against these petitioners that they assaulted the informant and tied him with pole. Case diary has been received.

The injury report is available in the case diary wherein the Doctor has found simple injury on the person of the informant. It is mentioned in paragraph-8 of the bail petition that a joint compromise petition has been filed by both the parties in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34274 of 2017 (3) dt.21-09-2017 2/2 the court below.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 60 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.