Amar Kumar Raj @ Amar Kumar Ray @ Amar Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65282 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2025 Thana- Patarghat District- Saharsa ====================================================== Amar Kumar Raj @ Amar Kumar Ray @ Amar Kumar Ram S/o Baleshwar Ray @ Baleshwar Ram R/o Village- Pama Kala Ward No. 11, P.S.- Pastpar, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patarghat P.S. Case No. 25 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 109, 351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35, 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case is that on 12.02.2025, on secret information that 6-7 criminals were conspiring to commit crime, the informant SHO Patarghat P.S. with police party raided the place and the accused persons, who on being chased, fired upon the police.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65282 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that as per FIR, one countrymade pistol has been recovered from this petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that there is no allegation of firing against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 12.02.2025 and has four criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Patarghat P.S. Case No. 25 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T