Shiv Nandan Prasad Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18159 of 2019 ====================================================== Shiv Nandan Prasad Jaiswal S/o Late Manohar Bhagat @ Late Manohar Prasad Jaiswal Vill.- Sadhua, P.s.- Rangra (Gopalpur), Distt.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna 3.
The Collector Bhagalpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur 4.
The Collector Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa 5.
The District Land Acquisition Officer Camp-Naugachhia, Distt.- Bhagalpur 6.
The Special Land Acquistion Officer Koshi Yojna Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa 7.
The Additional Collector (Lok Shikayat Niwaran) cum District Lok Shikayat Nivaran Officer Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa 8.
The Anchal Adhikari Thana Bihpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Md.Khurshid Alam (Aag12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-01-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):
(i) For direction to make payment of the compensation of the land of the petitioner bearing Khata No.598, Khesra No.50, Bhuarjan no.10 for total area 0.32 decimal which has been acquired by Govt. in the year 2007 for construction of Trimuhani
Patna High Court CWJC No.18159 of 2019(3) dt.07-01-2026 2/2 Kursela Tatbandh and all procedure has been completed and land has been acquired and Trimuhani Kursela Tatbandh has been made but amount of compensation the said acquired land has not paid till date to the petitioner or his ancestors where construction of Trimuhani Kursela Tatbandh has been made over the petitioner's land in question.
(ii) For further direction to make the compensation of land as a Commercial rate with 18% inte-rest per annum and petitioner has filed several representa-tion before the authorities which is pending till today.
(iii) For direction to pay the cost of litigation to the petitioner.
(iv) For other any relief or reliefs for which the petition-er is found fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. For want of prosecution, dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U