Ravindra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62839 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2025 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Ravindra Paswan S/o Late Gopal Paswan R/o Ward No 3, Padrauna, PSLauriya, District- West Champaran 2.
Indu Devi W/o Ravindra Paswan R/o Ward No 3, Padrauna, PS- Lauriya, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
X W/o Y R/o Ward No 3, Padrauna, PS- Lauriya, District- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 87, 96, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 2 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Jagu Paswan kidnapped her minor daughter, aged about 15 years, accordingly, she went to the house of Jagu Paswan when petitioners abused her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that the victim was in love with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62839 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 Jagu Paswan and she eloped. It is next submitted that the victim came back and has not supported the case of the prosecution in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. It is also submitted that petitioners, being parents of Jagu Paswan, have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant in order to coerce Jagu Paswan into submission.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submits that the victim was a minor aged about 15 years on which learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that no doubt victim is a minor but then petitioners were not involved in the occurrence.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T