Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2071 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2020 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR Son of AmRedra Rai @ Amrendra Singh Resident of Village - Bhairopur, P.S.- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yatindra Narayan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2022 Heard Mr. Yatindra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State via video conferencing.
Petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail inasmuch as earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court on 12.04.2021 in Cr. Misc. No. 6244/2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has not registered any substantial progress and no witness has been examined.
From perusal of the materials on record, it appears that petitioner was found sitting along with other accused persons in Bolero Vehicle from where 23.465 Kilo Grams of Ganja and 915 Grams of Charas were recovered along with a country made pistol and four live cartridges and the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2071 of 2022(2) dt.09-02-2022 2/2 having criminal antecedent also.
Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court without any observation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not placed any fresh ground for consideration of his second bail application. Taking into consideration the recovery of commercial quantity of Ganja and more than small quantity of Charas from the vehicle where petitioner was found sitting and the petitioner has got criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the same is, hereby, rejected. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U T