Sri Ram Chandra Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19045 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Sri Ram Chandra Yadav, Son of Sri Jagdish Yadav, MohallaKrishnapuri, Post- Madhepura Ward No. 1 Via/DistrictMadhepura.

2. Sri Dinanath Bharti, Son of Sri Laxmi Narayan Ram, MohallaAjadnagar, Post/Via/ Distt- Madhepura.

3. Sri Ram Narayan, Son of Sri Bhagvat Ram, Vill/PostBhatkheda, Via- Budhma, District- Madhepura.

4. Manoj Kumar, Son of Sri Krishna Dhan Prasad Yadav, MohallaThakur Prasad, Post- Madhepura, Ward No. 10, Distt.- Madhepura.

5. Sri Pradeep Kumar, Son of Sri Hari Narayan Yadav, VillJhitkiya, Post- Chatra, Via- Gwalpada, Distt- Madhepura.

6. Sri Bipin Kumar, Son of Sri Dipnarayan Yadav, Ward No. 1, Post/Via/Distt- Madhepura.

7. Mrs. Nutan Kumar, Wife of Sri Mahendra Ram, MohallaMadhepura, Ward No. 14, Post/Via/Distt- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary Education Department Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Director Secretary Education Government of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, AC to SC13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-11-2018 Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to raise their claim before the Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Budha Marg, Patna (respondent No. 4).

The claim of the petitioners is for determination of seniority and other consequential benefits at par with other

Patna High Court CWJC No.19045 of 2016(4) dt.27-11-2018 2/2 teachers similarly situated and selected against Advertisement No. 1 of 1988. The petitioners are stated to be working as Assistant Teachers in different schools.

In view of the limited submission made by the Counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.

The petitioners should make representation within a period of four weeks. In the event such a representation is filed, respondent No. 4 is obliged to consider the same and dispose of the claim of the petitioners by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the claim of the petitioners. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) SNkumar/- U