Satyendra Kumar Rajvanshi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2876 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Satyendra Kumar Rajvanshi and Ors Son of Sri Saryug Rajvanshi, Resident of Rajgir, Ward No. 4, P.S.-Rajgir, District-Nalanda. 2.
Ravi Kumar, Son of Sri Baleshwar Yadav, Resident of Mohalla-T.N. Path, P.S.-Kankarbagh, District-Patna.
3.
Sanjay Ranjan Kumar, Son of Sri Jagar Nath Ram, Resident of Panchvati Nagar, Rajgir, P.S.-Rajgir, District-Nalanda. All are Presently Working as Daily Wages Under Rajgir Nagar Panchayat, P.S.-Rajgir, District-Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Deputy Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The District Magistrate, Nalanda.
5.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajgir, District-Nalanda. 6.
The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Rajgir District-Nalanda 7.
The Chairman-Cum-Chief Councillor, Nagar Panchayat, Rajgir, DistrictNalanda. 8.
The Accountant-Cum-Head Clerk, Nagar Panchayat, Rajgir, DistrictNalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None.
For the Respondent/s :
None.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-09-2023 On call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners nor there is any representation from the other side. The present writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing upon the respondents concerned specially respondent no. 6 to give effect of regularization of the services of
Patna High Court CWJC No.2876 of 2018(3) dt.18-09-2023 2/2 petitioners in view of Section 38(b) of 1 Municipal Act, 2007 in view of advisory issued from the level of respondent no. 3 in the light of resolution passed by Nagar Parishad, Rajgir where the petitioners are working for last 12 years against post of Class-IV and still continuing having been assigned the duty under the Nagar Panchayat, but despite having resolved to regularize the services of petitioners in its meeting of Nagar Panchayat no final decision is being taken up compelling petitioners to lead penury life and/or any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioners are found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of this case.
Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U