Baishkhi Devi @ Baishakhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65833 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2023 Thana- BARAUNI RAIL P.S. District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Baishkhi Devi @ Baishakhi W/O Ravi Pasi R/O Vill - Biri Dangal Jhanakpura Barakar, P.S. - Kulti, Distt. - Vardhaman (W.B) 2.

Rabina Pasi W/O Raja Pasi R/O Vill - Biri Dangal Jhanakpura Barakar, P.S. - Kulti, Distt. - Vardhaman (W.B) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 379, 411, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case the petitioners were apprehended on the spot and on search several ornament, cash, mobile and other articles were recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. It is further submitted that the petitioners have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65833 of 2023(4) dt.05-01-2024 2/2 got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial custody since 05.07.2023.

Learned APP appearing for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the petitioners belong to West Bengal and they are arrested on the spot. It is further submitted that from their possession many valuable golden ornament, cash were recovered. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact and gravity of this case, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) manishkumar/- U T