Bandana @ Kumari Bandana @ Bandana Devi v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4686 of 2018 ====================================================== Bandana @ Kumari Bandana @ Bandana Devi, Wife of Ashok Prasad, Resident of Village- Balua, P.O.- Banakatwa, P.S.- Jitna, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department (HRDD), Government of India, New Delhi. 2.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The State Project Director, Bihar Education Project Council, Shiksha Bhawan, Rastra Bhasha Parisar, Saidpur, Rajendra Nagar. 4.

The Director, Purba Balpan Education Bihar Shiksha Pariyojana, Beltron Bhawan, Patna.

5.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 7.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 8.

The District Programme Officer, Primary Education and Sursiksha Abhiyan, Bihar Education, East Champaran at Motihari ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar, AC to GP-20 For BEPC : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 24-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

Counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to the order passed in 21251 of 2012 dated 11.04.2013 whereby a Coordinate Bench of this Court has already considered the fact that the scheme of Bal Barg Didis has now ceased to exist. Noticing the aforesaid development, the Court

Patna High Court CWJC No.4686 of 2018(2) dt.24-02-2020 2/2 observed that the case of the petitioners for accommodating in other ongoing scheme in regular or in establishment may be considered, in case such representations are filed to the Education Department to consider their cases. The Court observed that the Department may consider the fact that they had put in service for more than 10 years.

In order to maintain consistency, the present writ application is disposed of in similar terms.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U