Ekhlaq Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10810 of 2017 ====================================================== Ekhlaq Ahmad son of Mohammad Umar resident of village Dhobaha, Post Office & Police Station - Chand, Kaimur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Kaimur.

5. The District Education Officer, Kaimur.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Kaimur.

7. The Block Education Officer, Mohania Block, Kaimur.

8. The Block Development Officer cum Secretary, Mohania Block, Kaimur.

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Unit Mohania Block, District - Kaimur.

10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat unit Mohania Block, District - Kaimur.

11. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority through its Secretary, Kaimur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy No. 1- SC13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 21-02-2018 In view of the fact that in similarly circumstanced case of petitioner in CWJC No. 8097 of 2017 specific stand was taken by the respondents for grant of two months time for payment of the dues of the petitioner. It is expected that respondents will maintain the same standard for the purpose of redressal of the grievance of this petitioner also.

Of course, in that case they have filed counter affidavit and statement has been made in para 10 of the CWJC No. 8097of

Patna High Court CWJC No.10810 of 2017 dt.21-02-2018 2/2 2017, in this case there is no counter affidavit, but having regard to the fact that all the cases involve similar question of fact and law, there is no point to keep this matter pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent District Programme Officer (Establishment), Kaimur at Bhabhua to examine the case of the petitioner and if it is found that the case of the petitioner is similar to the case of the petitioner of CWJC No. 8097 of 2017, similar treatment should be extended to this petitioner also within a maximum period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 23.02.2018 Transmission Date