Patna High CourtMJC/173/2018disposed

Shaligram Sah v. Sri Amir Subhani, The Principal Secretary General Administration Department, Government Of Bihar,Pa

2019-01-02Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.173 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16709 of 2016 ====================================================== Shaligram Sah, Son of Sri Lakhan Lal Sah, Resident of 101, Pinevilla, Apartment, Road No. 15, Patel Nagar, Police Station-Shastri Nagar, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Sri Amir Subhani, The Principal Secretary General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. Sri Keshav Kumar Singh, the Joint Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Ram Bishun Roy, the Under secretary, General Administration Department, Government of BIhar, Patna.

4. Sri Udaykant Jha, the Joint Commissioner, Department Enquiry, Patna Division, Patna.

5. Sri Anupam Kumar, the District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.

6. Sri Ramchandraruddu, the Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas, Sasaram.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Nikesh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.P. K. Verma, AAG 3 Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, A.C. to A.A.G. 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 02-01-2019 Heard Mr. Amit Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, A.C. to A.A.G. 3 for the State.

Mr. Srivastava, while accepting that the consequential benefits arising from the order passed on the writ petition has been received by the petitioner, further submits that there are yet some grievances subsisting which have been denied to the petitioner because of the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings. He seeks liberty to raise those grievances before

Patna High Court MJC No.173 of 2018(6) dt.02-01-2019 2/2 the authority concerned.

Leave is granted.

The contempt application is disposed of accordingly.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/Ranveer U