Rahul Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64860 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2023 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Rahul Sahni S/o Mohan Sahni R/o Village - Satlakha, P.S - Rahika, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Ms. Kumari Pallavi, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 393 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged by the informant, namely Santosh Chaudhary, that in a span of two months, unknown miscreants snatched cash from him four times in between Kapasia and Canal. It is further alleged that on 06.09.2023 at about 3 o'clock, when the informant was again carrying money, unknown miscreants intercepted him and tried to snatch money from him but when other people came, all of them fled away and one of the accused person was caught.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64860 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Rajesh Kumar Kant, who was apprehended at the spot.
5. On the other hand, Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner has got three criminal antecedent.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T