Acquatech Engineers Private Limited Through Smt. Madhu Singh v. Nripendra Narayan Ghosh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.553 of 2018 ====================================================== Acquatech Engineers Private Limited Through Smt. Madhu Singh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Nripendra Narayan Ghosh 2.

Mrigendra Narayan Ghosh, 3.

Mahendra Narayan Ghosh, 4.

Soumendra Narayan Ghosh, 1-4 are sons of Late Hitendra Narayan Ghosh, 5.

Dr. Ajoyendra Narayan Ghosh, Son of Late Jitendra Narayan Ghosh, 6.

Sadhan Ghosh, Wife of Late Amrendra Narayan Ghosh, 7.

Thirthendra Narayan Ghosh, Son of Late Amarendra Narayan Ghosh, 8.

Diptendra Narayan Ghosh, Son of Late Amarendra Narayan Ghosh, 9.

Mrs. Purbasa Ghosh Mukharjee, Wife of Ashim Mukharjee and Daughter of Late Amrendra Narayan Ghosh, All residents of B.M. Das Road, P.O.- Bankipore, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.

10.

Bijoy Kumar Das, Son of Sri Kewal Sharan Das, Resident of RBBD Road, Bhikhanpur, Bhagalpure presently residing at B.M. Das Road, P.O.- Bankipore, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.

11.

Smt. Anima Ranjan, Daughter of Sri Shiva Kumar Singh, Resident of RBBD Road, Bhikhanpur, Bhagalpur presently residing at B.M. Das Road, P.O.- Bankipore, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.

12.

Canara Bank, a body corporate, Constituted under the Banking Companies Acquisition and Transfer of ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma Mr.Anjani Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Shivendra Shankar Mr. Sanjay Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2022 With the consent of the parties, the impugned order, dated 25.11.2017, passed, in Title Suit No. 538 of 2010, by learned Sub Judge-I, Patna is set aside.

The petitioner-defendant no. 3 is permitted to contest

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.553 of 2018(5) dt.08-08-2022 2/2 the suit on its merit. Since the evidence of the parties has not concluded, the petitioner-defendant no. 3 is permitted to file written statement within a period of six weeks from today. Since the suit is of the year 2010, the learned Court below is directed to expedite the disposal of the suit within a reasonable time frame without giving unnecessary adjournments to either parties.

This application is disposed with the aforesaid observation and direction.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √