Md. Taslim @ Taslim v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58634 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2018 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Taslim @ Taslim, Son of Late Jhakasu, Resident of Village - Sonapur Ward No. 9, P.S - Sikti, Distt - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 03.07.2019 in connection with Sikti P.S. Case No.35 of 2018 registered for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that save and except suspicion, there is no further material in the record. Learned counsel further submits that the deceased was suffering from blood pressure and therefore, he may have sustained a fall.

Learned counsel for the State after perusal of the case diary submits that the petitioner was the key accused and the allegation is that the deceased had gone to demand

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58634 of 2019(4) dt.29-11-2019 2/2 his money from the present petitioner and thereafter he was found in an injured condition and finally he succumbed to the same. The post-mortem report reveals multiple injuries caused by hard and blunt substance.

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that there is ample material in the case diary, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly, rejected.

However, the trial of the case may be expedited so as to conclude within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In case the same is not concluded, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T