Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2558/2017bail granted

Ajay Chauhan @ Bhodu v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-31Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2558 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2016 Thana -SISWAN District- SIWAN ====================================================== Ajay Chauhan @ Bhodu, son of Jagarnath Chauhan, resident of villageRuknapar, P.S.-Prayagpur, District-Bahraich (U.P.). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Bansh Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No.112 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, the petitioner was caught and from his possession one loaded country made Katta and other articles such as mobile etc. were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of the circumstances, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is suffering in custody since 11.08.2016.

Learned A.P.P. submits that after six months the petitioner may be released.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2558 of 2017 (2) dt.31-01-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail after completion of six months in custody on execution of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sandeep Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No.112 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Arvind/- U T