Smt. Sumitra Devi v. Most. Dharmsheela Devi And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.10 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Smt. Sumitra Devi wife of Vijay Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Kurji Kadhiya Digha, P.S. - Digha, Distt - Patna. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. Most. Dharmsheela Devi Wife of Late Ramesh Prasad Singh of Mohalla - Bichaligali, Gola Road, P.S. - Danapur, Distt. - Patna, At present residing at Sadikpur, Rukanpura, P.O. B.V. College, P.S. Rukanpura, Distt. Patna.
2. Arvind Kumar son of Sri Ram Krishan Bhagat resident of mohalla - South Mandiri, P.O. - G.P.O., P.S. - Budha Colony, Distt. - Patna.
3. Alok Kumar Son of Ram Lakhan Roy Resident of Village - Sultanpur, Danapur, P.O. - Danapur Cant, P.S. - Danapur, Distt. - Patna.
4. Rishikesh Kumar Son of Ram Lakhan Roy of Village - Sultanpur Danapur, P.O. - Danapur Cant, P.S.- Danapur, Distt. - Patna.
5. Upendra Kumar son of Sri Krishna Mahto Resident of Gola Road, P.S. - Danapur, Distt. - Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order dated 24.10.2016 passed by Sub Judge-IIIrd, Danapur, Patna in Title Suit No. 17 of 2008, whereby the learned court below has dismissed the application dated 27.05.2014 on the ground that it was not pressed by the petitioner.
In view of the above fact that the application has been dismissed as not pressed. There is no question of interference by the High Court in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction arises.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.10 of 2017 (2) dt.17-01-2017 2/2 Thus, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order and, accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous application is dismissed.
(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) Vats/- U T