Jai Nandan Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39671 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2016 Thana -ALIPUR District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Jai Nandan Singh Son of Late Chandradeo Singh Resident of Village - Bohiya, P.S. - Alipur, District - Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Bihar State of Food & Civil Supplies Co. Ltd, through the Managing Director, Bihar, Patna.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2017 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Alipur P.S.Case No.49 of 2016 , registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of causing loss of Rs.37 lac as he has not given accounting of 2641 quintals of paddy.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that accounting is wrong and only Rs.11 lac is due with the petitioner. It has also been submitted that he had given paddy to a Rice Mill but he has not written the same, as such loss was caused
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39671 of 2017 (4) dt.13-09-2017 2/2 and the petitioner is in custody since 5.6.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the B.S.F.C. They have opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner as he has caused loss of money to the Corporation. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected and the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T