M/S U And M Enterprises v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Pankaj Kumar Pal The Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2210 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15877 of 2021 ====================================================== M/s U and M Enterprises having its Head Office at Chittra, P.S. - Chittra, Sub-Division - Madhupur, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) through its Partner Umesh Singh, aged about 52 years (Male), Son of Late Badri Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Saharjari, P.O. - Bartand, P.S. - Chittra, District - Deoghar (Jharkhand).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Mr. Pankaj Kumar Pal the Secretary Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Mr. Pravin Kumar Thakur, The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Mr. Pravin Kumar Thakur, The Additional Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Mr. Amrendra Kumar Sinha, The Chief Engineer-2, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5.
Mr. Arshad Alam, The Superintending Engineer, Work Circle Bhagalpur, Rural Works Department, District - Bhagalpur. 6.
Mr. Arvind Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Work Division Banka - 2, Rural Works Department, District - Banka.
7.
Mr. Pritam Kumar, The Assistant Engineer, The Executive Engineer, Work Division Banka- 2, Rural Works Department, District - Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.S. Raza Ahmad (AAG 5) :
Mr. Bijoy Kr. Sinha, AC to AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 05-04-2023 The defects pointed out by the registry are ignored. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 25.03.2022, passed in C.W.J.C. no.
Patna High Court MJC No.2210 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2023 2/2 15877 of 2021, disobedience whereof, has been complained of in the present contempt petition, has already stood complied with during the interregnum period, hence, the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition.
Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ( Shailendra Singh, J) rinkee/sanjayU