Umar Azad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1542 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

UMAR AZAD SON OF MD. MATLOOB R/O VILLAGE- SAIDPUR, P.S.- GHOSHI, DIST.- JEHANABAD 2.

MD. NAZIR ALAM SON OF MD. MUSTAFA R/O VILLAGE- SAIDPUR, P.S.- GHOSHI, DIST.- JEHANABAD 3.

MD. IMRAN SON OF UMAR AZAD R/O VILLAGE- SAIDPUR, P.S.- GHOSHI, DIST.- JEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prashant Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case no. 288/2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 354(B) and 354(D) of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution story relates to abuse and assault to the informant and his family members by the petitioners and other coaccused persons. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The present case is counter blast of Ghosi P.S. Case No. 289 of 2021 which was lodged by the daughter of petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1542 of 2022(2) dt.26-07-2022 2/2 no. 1 against he informant and only with a view to put pressure upon the petitioners, the present case has been filed. Informant was medically examined by the doctor who has opined that injury nos. 1 and 2 are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance and regarding injury no. 3, opinion is reserved.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case no. 288/2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM Jehanabad subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U