Ram Pratap Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40554 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2016 Thana -BISFI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Ram Pratap Thakur, S/o Late Ram Jatan Thakur, Resident of VillageRaghauli, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bisfi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that occurrence took place on account of land dispute. The informant and petitioner are neighbours. The wife of this petitioner has also lodged case against prosecution party vide Bisfi P.S. Case No. 157 of 2016. In the instant case there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he tried to outrage the modesty of mother-in-law of the informant.

It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40554 of 2017 (2) dt.06-09-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipatti, Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T