Prabhat Kumar Chaudhary @ Prabhat Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65627 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Prabhat Kumar Chaudhary @ Prabhat Kumar S/o Sanjay Choudhary Resident of Village- Nim Chak Haider, P.S.- Chakmehasi, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No.214/2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 191(2), 324(4)(5), 326, 132, 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of 13 cases and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant because of his antecedents. It is next submitted that in sum and substance the informant alleges that he received an information about a dead body, accordingly he reached the place of occurrence where a mob had gathered and the petitioner was leading the mob which created great inconvenience to passerby including vehicles and the petitioner asked for petrol so that the same can be sprinkled

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65627 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 and the vehicles be damaged but then the informant and the force controlled the situation.

4. Learned counsel submits that though it is alleged that petitioner was leading the mob and created disturbance but then a dead body was found at the place of occurrence, as such the villagers had gathered and the petitioner also being a native of the same place, out of inquisitiveness, came to the place of occurrence, when he came to be implicated.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner has antecedent of 13 cases and in the event if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner may abscond and investigation in the case is continuing.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T