Ranjeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40531 of 2017 (4) dt.06-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40531 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2017 Thana -PARSABAZAR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Paswan S/o Ram Pravesh Paswan, Resident of VillageMadhuban, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anand Prakash Prabhakar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Parsabazar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 394, 412 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other accused person is of assaulting the informant with knife and forcibly taking away his tractor for unloading sand and on hulla police chased the accused persons and caught them and from one of the accused persons blood stained knife was recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been in custody for last nine months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40531 of 2017 (4) dt.06-11-2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that petitioner was arrested on spot on chase by the police, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail to the petitioner. This application is accordingly dismissed.

However, since the petitioner has been in custody for last nine months, trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of seven months and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the trial court itself. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T