Patna High CourtMJC/2954/2016dismissed

Pragya Bharti Bihar Through Its Secretary Dr. Bhupendra Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna And ORS

2017-03-29Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2954 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10401 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Pragya Bharti ( Bihar ) through its Secretary Dr. Bhupendra Kumar Mishra S/o Baliram Mishra R/o Mohalla Sheoganj Arrah, P.S. - Arrah Town, District - Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

5. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

6. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

7. Mohammad Israil Khan, Professor, Department of Psychology, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishwajit Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, A.C. to AAG-9 For the University : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH) 29-03-2017 This application under Article of the Constitution of India has been filed for modification of the order dated 27.07.2016 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 10401 of 2016 to the extent for a direction upon the respondent no.4 to examine the aspect as raised in the modification application.

Patna High Court MJC No.2954 of 2016 (2) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 We have heard Mr. Vishwajit Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Girijesh Kumar, learned counsel for the University.

We do not see any reason to modify the aforesaid order dated 27.07.2016. Neither any error apparent on the face of the record nor any omission has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pradeep/- U