Nilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Vinay Kumar The Principal Secretary, Department Of Public Health Eng

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.523 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 29 of 2014 ====================================================== Nilesh Kumar, Son of Late Bankesh Prasad Sinha, resident of VillageAmarpur, P.S.- Dhansoi, District- Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Vinay Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Department of Public Health Engineering, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Dineshwar Prasad Singh, the Engineer-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Raghav Jee Ram, the Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Ramchandra Prasad, the Superintending Engineer, Bihar Rajya Jal Parishad Ganga Project Circle No.1, Patna.

5. The Bihar Rajya Jal Parishad through Mr. Rajesh Meena, Secretary, West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

6. Mr. Rajesh Meena, Principal Secretary, Bihar Rajya Jal Parishad, West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

7. Mr. Anil Kumar, the Chief Engineer, Bihar Rajya Jal Parishad, West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

8. Sri Sudarshad Prasad, the Executive Engineer, Bihar Rajya Jal Parishad, West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Siyaram Pandey, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad, AC to AAG- 5 For O.P. Nos.5 to 8 : Mr. Indrajeet Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party Nos.5 to 8 as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. A show cause has been filed in this case, in which the authorities have considered the case of the petitioner and rejected the same. It thus appears that due consideration has

Patna High Court MJC No.523 of 2018 (5) dt.26-06-2018 2/2 been given to the case of the petitioner and the same is rejected. Thus, the order of this Court stands complied with and the only thing which can be available to the petitioner is to challenge the same, in accordance with law.

The contempt application stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate legal recourse, as may be tenable under law.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U