Kishto Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39257 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -JAIPUR District- BANKA ====================================================== Kishto Yadav, son of Late Bhrigu Yadav, R/o Village- Heth Madhiya, P.S.- Jaipur, District- Banka.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Jaipur P.S.Case No. 13 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and the allegation is dowry death.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that charge-sheet in this case has been submitted under Section 306 IPC and nothing specific has been attributed to the petitioner and the allegation is omnibus and general and further he is in custody for four months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39257 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Jaipur P.S.Case No. 13 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U