Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6131 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1002 Year- 2015 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary S/o Ram Kishore Tiwary.
2. Reshma Tiwary w/o Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary.
Both resident of village- Dhodhandih, Police Station- Kachhawan, District- Rohtas. At present resident of Mohalla Awadhut Nagar, Police Station- Sasaram (Darigaon), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 08-02-2016 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 1 has been arrested, hence, his application has become infructuous and accordingly, it is disposed of.
The petitioner no. 2 is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 354, 323, 420, 406, 211 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that the husband of the informant gave Rs.Three lakhs to petitioner no. 1 Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary through cheque on the agreement to return the same within six months. Thereafter, petitioner no. 1 and his
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6131 of 2016 (2) dt.08-02-2016 2/2 brother returned Rs.1,42,000/- but failed to return Rs.1,58,000/-. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the tenant of the informant and the petitioner side lodged Complaint Case No. 1010 of 2015 on 04.08.2015 against the informant for making assault and taking away households articles along with cash and thereafter the present case has been lodged.
Considering the thrust of accusation against co-accused Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary, the petitioner being a lady and the case lodged by the petitioner side at earlier point of time, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 1002 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T