Gopal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66485 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2017 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Gopal Kumar Son of Arvind Kumar @ Tunni R/o Village- Arian, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases.
4. Allegation is of recovery of 20 litres of liquor from an orchard and 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from an orchard which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and is not the owner of the seized vehicle. It is further submitted that petitioner came to be implicated at the instance of the local people
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66485 of 2024(2) dt.13-09-2024 2/2 but then it is submitted that the police in majority of the cases implicate either at the instance of the Chawkidar, local people, secret information or confessional statement in a mechanical manner without holding proper investigation of the case.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 161 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
8. However, the learned trial court, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner, shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T