Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39074/2015bail granted

Daulti Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-09-28Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39074 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -186 Year- 2015 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Daulti Devi W/o Bhola Manjhi '

2. Dulari Devi @ Tula Devi W/o Sojit Manjhi

3. Rubi Devi W/o Rajesh Manjhi

4. Malo Devi W/o Rajo Manjhi, All are Residents of Village Kolhana, Police Station Wazirganj, District Gaya.

....... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Wazirganj PS Case No. 186 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 325, 302, 367, 120B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

On the sole ground that the petitioners are female and there is no likelihood of them tampering with the evidence or flee from the course of the investigation, this application is allowed.

Let the petitioners above named, in the event of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39074 of 2015 (2) dt.28-09-2015 2/2 their arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Wazirganj PS Case No. 186 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the Police/Court, as the case may be, and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

If the petitioners fail to co-operate in the Court of Sessions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to approach this Court for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) mrl U T