Prof. Abdul Quaiyum v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1710 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 23177 of 2013 =========================================================== Prof. Abdul Quaiyum Son Of Late Sheikh Sabdul Resident Of Village- Urdu Chowk Gajipur, P.S.- Tarapur, District- Munger, Incharge Principal Ramdeo Asharfi Intermediate College, Shambhuganj, District- Banka .... .... Appellant
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar, Through Secretary Human Resources Bihar, Patna
2. Secretary, Bihar Vidyalaya Pariksha Samiti (U.M.), Budh Marg, Patna
3. Smt. Anusuya Devi Wife Of Bindeshwari Prasad Singh Resident Of VillageMohanpur, P.O.- Mahisota, P.S.- Shambhuganj, District- Banka. Chairman Of R.A. Inter College, Shambhuganj, District- Banka
4. Sri Udai Kumar Singh Resident Of Village- Rahul Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Sultanganj, District- Banka, Secretary Of R.A. Inter College, Shambhuganj, District- Banka
5. Sri Pramod Kumar Singh Son Of Late Ram Charitra Singh Resident Of Village And P.O. Katahara, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur, At Present In-Charge Principal Ramdeo Asharfi Intermediate College, Shambhuganj, District- Banka .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant :
Mr. Rana Ishwar Chandra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Kumari Amrita, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 10-03-2017 Heard counsel for the appellant and counsel for the State.
The learned single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ application refusing to exercise discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in a matter relating to removal of the Principal of the Inter College, which is in the hands of a private Managing Committee. Such a view is fortified by an earlier decision noted in
Patna High Court LPA No.1710 of 2013 dt.10-03-2017 2/2 the impugned order. Liberty has been given to the appellant to move a civil Court for appropriate declaration. That is good enough opportunity and relief which the appellant can avail. Appeal is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 16.03.2017 Transmission Date N/A