Sunil Roy @ Sunil Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40231 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2017 Thana -DIDARGANJ District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sunil Roy @ Sunil Rai, Son of Daroga Roy, Resident of VillageDidarganj, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Didarganj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-363, 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that Lalu Kumar took away the daughter of the informant forcibly. The informant alleged that this petitioner who is Devar of Sanjeela Devi, has hand in the aforesaid occurrence. As such, mere suspicion has been raised against this petitioner.

There is specific allegation against Lalu Kumar of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40231 of 2017 (2) dt.01-09-2017 of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T