Pramod Prajapati v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1630 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2021 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Pramod Prajapati Son Of Late Ram Prasad Prajapati Resident Of Village - Hajari Babhan Sota, P.S.- Nabinagar, Distt.- Aurangabad. 2.

Binod prajapati son of late ram prasad prajapati resident of village - hajari babhan sota, P.S.- Nabinagar, Distt.- Aurangabad. 3.

Madan Prajapati Son Of Late Ram Prasad Prajapati Resident Of Village - Hajari Babhan Sota, P.S.- Nabinagar, Distt.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(A), 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that all the F.I.R named accused persons including petitioners, variously armed entered into the house of the informant and made assault, as a result of which the informant,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1630 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 2/3 her husband and brother-in-law sustained injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in the background of some land dispute, the present F.I.R has been registered. There is counter version of the occurrence also and petitioners' side also received injuries. There is no accusation of repeating the blow. The injury reports suggests that informant and her husband sustained simple injuries caused by hard and blunt substance, however, brother-in-law of the informant sustained grievous injuries but that injury was caused by hard and blunt substance on non-vital part of the body. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1630 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 3/3 satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 95 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T