← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68059/2024dismissed

Akbari Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-20Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68059 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-484 Year-2022 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Akbari Khatoon Wife of Khurshid Shah @ Khurshid Ali @ Khurshid @ Khursid Ali R/o - Ibrahimpur, P.S - Baniyapur, District - Saran 2.

Khurshid Shah @ Khurshid Ali @ Khurshid @ Khursid Ali son of Orsah Shah R/o - Ibrahimpur, P.S - Baniyapur, District - Saran 3.

Jamila Khatoon Daughter of Khurshid Shah @ Khurshid Ali @ Khurshid @ Khursid Ali R/o - Ibrahimpur, P.S - Baniyapur, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Wakil Mian Son of Ahmad Mian village- Narayan Tola, Ps- Baniyapur, DistSaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2024 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 484 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 24.09.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 328, 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It appears from the record that the petitioners have earlier moved for grant of anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 86702 of 2023 which was dismissed as withdrawn on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68059 of 2024(2) dt.20-09-2024 2/2 09.04.2024 with liberty to the petitioners to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today and seeks regular bail.

4. It appears that the petitioners have neither complied the order dated 09.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 86702 of 2023 nor they have filed modification application for modifying the aforesaid order and they have filed the present bail petition for grant of anticipatory bail.

5. Second anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T