Narad Yadav @ Gulabchand v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67707 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2024 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Narad Yadav @ Gulabchand Son of Late Hazari Yadav Resident of Village - Chiksil, P.S. - Karakat, District - Rohtas 2.

Manjeet Kumar Son of Narad Yadav @ Gulabchand Resident of Village - Chiksil, P.S. - Karakat, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaubey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 25.5 liters of liquor from a bush.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and they came to be implicated at the instance of local villagers, but then it is submitted that police in majority of the cases implicates accused persons either at the instance of Chowkidar, local person, secret information or

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67707 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 2/2 confessional statement in a mechanical manner without holding a proper investigation.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 285 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. However, it is made clear the learned Trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioners shall verify their criminal antecedent and in the event if it is found that any of the petitioners have antecedent of even one case in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T