Anant Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62848 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2025 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
Anant Kumar Singh S/O Late Baliram Prasad Singh @ Ram Bali Singh Resident of Village- Mirganj, P.S.-Wazirganj, District- Gaya 2.
Pinki Devi W/O Anant Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Mirganj, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing vehemently for sometimes realizing his difficulty, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.1, Anant Kumar Singh.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no.1, Anant Kumar Singh.
5. The petitioner no.2 seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 115(2), 308(5), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2)(3) of
2/4 the B.N.S.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that her husband retired from a government school on 30.06.2024 and received its retiral benefits thereafter her only son Nikku started demanding the retiral benefit amount, on objection he assaulted her husband who suffered brain haemorrhage and thus, he was taken to hospital for treatment. It is next alleged that on intervention of well-wishers case was not instituted but her son continued with his demand and abuse. It is next alleged that her son resides with his in-laws at Gaya. Further, on 27.12.2024 at about 2.00 P.M.
her son along with named accused persons including the petitioner came with arms and abused her and Nikku gave orders to kill his father since he did not part with his retiral dues, thereafter, Nikku and Anant pressed neck of her husband and her husband started suffocating, thereafter accused persons assaulted her daughter Ritu, who came to save her father by fists, thereafter, Nikku, Anant and Sanjay broke the trunk and looted ornaments worth Rs.4 Lacs along with other articles as recorded in the FIR and threatened that if retrial amount is not given, they will be killed.
3/4 daughter were treated in a hospital and occurrence was witnessed by named witnesses.
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case being mother in-law of Nikku. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that thrust of the allegation of abuse and assault is against Nikku, but then, Anant who is father in-law of Nikku is also alleged to have assaulted and pressed the neck of the husband of the informant and no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioner.
8. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it manifests that an aggrieved mother has instituted the instant FIR alleging against her only wavered son that he in greed of retiral amount of his father along with the family of his in-laws assaulted the informant and her side, but then, is not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioner no.2.
9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner no.2, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court
4/4 below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Balia P. S. Case No.04 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
10.
The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T